Mastering the Classroom

Farrel's "Backwards Model"   Farrel's Backwards Planning Model is a framework I have partially incorporated into my lesson planning. While I don’t always start with clearly defined end goals in mind, I do structure my lessons around guided notes taken from the textbook, which include key information students need to understand for the assessment. During instruction, I reinforce learning by reviewing and correcting these notes with the class. This is assessment focused lesson planning, but not completely aligned with Farrel's model. Farrel’s Backwards Model supports alignment between the written curriculum, taught curriculum, and assessment by delivering content to students through multiple formats—pre-reading, guided notes, and lecture—before being assessed. The assessment questions align with the guided notes, which reflect the core concepts from the curriculum. This model reinforces consistency between what is planned (written curriculum), what is delivered (ta...

 N aturalistic or Technological Approach?   I identify more with a naturalistic approach when it comes to teaching and building my lesson plans. I value having flexibility built into my plans because, as any teacher knows, things rarely go exactly as expected. As a middle school teacher, I often have to adjust my day-to-day plans based on the unique needs and energy of each class. The naturalistic approach aligns with how teachers actually plan: balancing objectives and standards with the ability to pivot when necessary. While my lesson-plans are focused on objectives and standards, I believe the content I teach would be dull and forgettable without space for engaging activities, supplementary objectives, and hands-on experiences that help students truly connect with the material. As a middle school social studies teacher, I don’t really see myself adopting a dual approach in curriculum design and instructional delivery. I find that the naturalistic approach fits best with...

    U.S.A. vs. Finland: An Education Battle    It is not uncommon knowledge that Finland's students out-perform American students. The United States focuses on strict curriculum and standardized tests, while Finland does not do standardized tests (Colagrossi, 2018). Teachers in Finland have more freedom to teach without the pressure of covering specific test content.  many American students are taught to quickly memorize information just to pass a test—only to forget it soon after—rather than developing a deep, lasting understanding of the material.       Teacher qualifications are also more rigorous in Finland, where educators are required to hold a master’s degree (Colagrossi, 2018).  If the USA were to follow these standards, it could potentially reduce teacher turnover, and there would fewer people going into education just to coach and have summer's off (no offense to coaches! I am one!). This approach ...

 What Kind of Teacher Am I?        There are many different "types" of teachers- holistic, traditional, linear, laid back, or critical theorist. I was recently tasked with defining my own type, but I don't think I fit into just one. I believe I am a blend of a critical theorist- a teacher that encourages discussion about social issues, inequality, sometimes plays devil's advocate to help students think from a different perspective- and a traditionalist- a teacher that likes order, structure and is not afraid of enforcing discipline. My students know my rules and boundaries from day one. They know the repercussions of not following rules and expectations. But they also know I'm not a hard-ass. I understand that they are middle school kids, that they are not mature and that they will do and say dumb things without thinking. I have firm boundaries, and my students learn quickly to respect them.     I teach 6th and 7th grade social studies/geography and I ...